CODATA 2015 |
||
Medical
and Health Data
Behavioral and Social Science Data Data Policy Detailed ProgramList
of Participants About the CODATA 2002 Conference
|
1. Scholarly Information Architecture Paul Ginsparg Cornell University, USA If we were to start
from scratch today to design a quality-controlled archive and distribution
system for scientific and technical information, it could take a
very different form from what has evolved in the past decade from
pre-existing print infrastructure. Ultimately, we might expect some
form of global knowledge network for research communications. Over
the next decade, there are many technical and non-technical issues
to address along the way, everything from identifying optimal formats
and protocols for rendering, indexing, linking, querying, accessing,
mining, and transmitting the information, to identifying sociological,
legal, financial, and political obstacles to realization of ideal
systems. What near-term advances can we expect in automated classification
systems, authoring tools, and next-generation document formats to
facilitate efficient datamining and long-term archival stability?
How will the information be authenticated and quality controlled?
What differences should be expected in the realization of these
systems for different scientific research fields? What is the proper
role of governments and their funding agencies in this enterprise,
and what might be the role of suitably configured professional societies?
These and related questions will be considered in light of recent
trends.
2.
The role of scientific data in a complex world Physicists
try to understand and to describe the world in terms of natural
laws. These laws cover two quite different approaches in physics.
First, the laws show up a mathematical structure, which in general
is understood in terms of first principles, of geometrical relations
and of symmetry arguments. Second, the laws contain data which are
characteristic for the specific properties of the phenomena and
objects. Insight into the mathematical structure aims at an understanding
of the world in ever more universally applicable terms. Insight
into the data shows up the magnificent diversity of the world's
materials and ist behavior Whereas the description of the world
in terms of a unified theory one day might be reduced to only one
set of equations, the amount of data necessary to describe the phenomena
of the world in their full complexity seems to be open-ended.
3.
Life Sciences Research in 2015 Much of the spectacular progress of life sciences research in the past 30 years has come from the application of molecular biology employing a reductionist approach with single genes, often studied in simple organisms. Now from the technologies of genomics and proteomics, scientists are deluged with increasing amounts, varieties and quality of data. The challenge is how life sciences researchers will use the data output of discovery science to formulate questions and experiments for their research and turn this into knowledge. What are the important questions? We now have the capability to answer at a profound level major biological problems of how genes function, how development of organisms is controlled, and how populations interact at the cellular, organismal and population levels. What data and what tools are needed? What skills and training will be needed for the next generation of life sciences researchers? I will discuss some of the initiatives that are planned or now underway to address these problems.
|
|
Last site update: 15 March 2003
|